The test from where the information was drawn included primarily white lesbians (77%), leading to a pool that is racially homogenous of respondents. Another nervous about the test ended up being the disproportionate representation that is geographic. The majority of the sample (61%) is from the researcher’s home state, Indiana although eighty-four percent of the U.S. cities are represented in the Frequency vs. Satisfaction Survey with at least one respondent from each state. The instability in geographical representation may overemphasize the attitudes, values, and emotions of lesbians into the Midwest, which will be commonly thought to be more conservative. This bias that is geographic skew the study outcomes.
Another concern in regards to the sampling procedure results through the outreach technique utilized. Since the research ended up being conducted by way of a psychotherapist whom focuses on the proper care of lesbian individuals and partners, the survey outreach could have included a disproportionate quantity of lesbians who will be in treatment. And also this has got the prospective to bias the survey results, let’s assume that lesbians in treatment might provide with an increase of issues about their relationship than lesbians perhaps not in counseling.
A 3rd anxiety about the analysis pertains to the usage self-report to assemble information. In certain situations, lesbians had been asked to depend on their memory of the relationship that has been ended as much as half a year ago. The more number of recall that’s needed is, the higher margin of mistake there is certainly into the ultimate findings. Furthermore, lesbians who had been recounting their experiences of the previous relationship may have biased perception of the relationship dependent on just just how it finished.